Monday, February 28, 2011

meatless monday: spicy soba noodles


It's not much to look at in this iphone picture, but it tasted delicious and like we were still living with Japanese and Korean housemates.


Smitten Kitchen's Spicy Soba Noodles with Shiitakes and Cabbage. I used Bok Choy instead of napa cabbage, because that's what I had, and I added a shredded carrot to the veggie mix. The flavors were nearly perfect - I think I'd do a little less ginger next time, but otherwise I'd definitely make it again.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

ten days 'till Lent

We're attending an Episcopal church now, and one of the things I love about this church is our observance of the church calendar. This year, Lent begins on Wednesday, March 9, and Jack and I have just about decided that we want to give up watching tv.


But if I'm thinking about what to "give up" for Lent, I'm also thinking about what to "take up" for Easter. It was Surprised by Hope that nudged my thoughts in this direction. Here are some of NT Wright's suggestions on how to transform our celebration of Easter:

Easter is about the wild delight of God’s creative power – not very Anglican, perhaps, but at least we ought to shout Alleluias instead of murmuring them; we should light every candle in the building instead of only some; we should give every man, woman, child, cat, dog, and mouse in the place a candle to hold; we should have a real bonfire; and we should splash water about as we renew our baptismal vows. Every step back from that is a step toward an ethereal or esoteric Easter experience, and the thing about Easter is that it is neither ethereal nor esoteric. It’s about the real Jesus coming out of the real tomb and getting God’s real new creation under way.

But my biggest problem starts on Easter Monday. I regard it as absurd and unjustifiable that we should spend forty days keeping Lent, pondering what it means, preaching about self-denial, being at least a little gloomy, and then bringing it all to a peak with Holy Week, which in turn climaxes in Maundy Thursday and Good Friday … and then, after a rather odd Holy Saturday, we have a single day of celebration.

All right, the Sundays after Easter still lie within the Easter season. We still have Easter readings and hymns during them. But Easter week itself ought not to be the time when all the clergy sigh with relief and go on holiday. It ought to be an eight-day festival, with champagne served after morning prayer or even before, with lots of alleluias and extra hymns and spectacular anthems. Is it any wonder people find it hard to believe in the resurrection if we don’t throw our hats in the air? Is it any wonder we find it hard to live the resurrection if we don’t do it exuberantly in our liturgies? Is it any wonder the world doesn’t take much notice if Easter is celebrated as simply the one-day happy ending tacked on to forty days of fasting and gloom? It’s long overdue that we took a hard look at how we keep Easter in church, at home, in our personal lives, right through the system. And if it means rethinking some cherished habits, well, maybe it’s time to wake up...

In particular, if Lent is a time to give things up, Easter ought to be a time to take things up. Champagne for breakfast again—well, of course. Christian holiness was never meant to be merely negative. Of course you have to weed the garden from time to time; sometimes the ground ivy may need serious digging before you can get it out. That’s Lent for you. But you don’t want simply to turn the garden back into a neat bed of blank earth. Easter is the time to sow new seeds and to plant out a few cuttings. If Calvary means putting to death things in your life that need killing off if you are to flourish as a Christian and as a truly human being, then Easter should mean planting, watering, and training up things in your life (personal and corporate) that ought to be blossoming , filling the garden with color and perfume, and in due course bearing fruit. The forty days of the Easter season, until the ascension, ought to be a time to balance out Lent by taking something up , some new task or venture, something wholesome and fruitful and outgoing and self-giving. You may be able to do it only for six weeks, just as you may be able to go without beer or tobacco only for the six weeks of Lent. But if you really make a start on it, it might give you a sniff of new possibilities, new hopes, new ventures you never dreamed of. It might bring something of Easter into your innermost life. It might help you wake up in a whole new way. And that’s what Easter is all about.

Monday, February 21, 2011

meatless monday: broccoli with cashews

This year, broccoli with cashews has been one of our favorite side dishes. Tonight we decided to make it the main event by adding some lightly fried tofu and serving it over steamed rice. It was totally satisfying. (If you make it, I suggest toasting the cashews for 8-10 minutes at 375 before adding them to the sauce.)


Jack has just gotten over a sinus infection, and I have just come down with one. Rose slept for three and a half hours this afternoon, and I suspect she may be fighting off a little something herself. The snow and ice are back. And I miss NyQuil.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

2 of 12

Jack: The Divine Conspiracy by Dallas Willard

Amy: Freedom by Jonathan Franzen

I read Jonathan Franzen's The Corrections (2001), winner of the National Book Award, while I was in college. It was an absorbing, expansive novel about a depressive midwestern family. I thought it was kind of brilliant.

Freedom, published last August, is another absorbing, expansive novel about a depressive midwestern family. It's a 562 page social-realist novel about "the way we live now," in the style of Tolstoy (as Franzen himself indicates with numerous allusions throughout Freedom) or Dickens. Once again, I fell into the world Franzen created and read obsessively until the story ended.

Franzen is a great writer, and he's received plenty of acclaim. The New York Times called Freedom "a masterpiece of American fiction," and New York Magazine gushed "total genius"; Time Magazine put Franzen on their August cover; President Obama reportedly read an advance copy of the novel on his summer holiday in Martha's Vineyard.

All this good press also brought Freedom some bad press. Several best-selling female authors complained that literary critics choose their favorites and shower praise on a few "white male literary darlings" without giving fair notice to equally brilliant novels by women. Jenifer Weiner (chick lit alert!):

"It's just interesting to sort of stack them up against a Lorrie Moore or against a Mona Simpson — who write books about families that are seen as excellent books about families," Weiner says. "And then to look at a Jonathan Franzen who writes a book about a family but we are told this is a book about America."

{Franzen, for the record, agrees with their critique: "The categories by which we value fiction are skewed male, and this creates a very destructive disconnect between the critical establishment and the predominantly female readership of novels," he says. "That's inarguable."}

Despite how absorbing and brilliant I did find this novel, especially some parts of it, I also found it to be a little heartless. While I cared about what happened to the characters, I didn't actually like any of the characters, and I found it hard to believe that Franzen did either. He seems to disdain just about every person he creates. And, frankly, I felt he was a little crass and heavy-handed in bringing home his theme of "freedom".

As the Berglunds - Walter, the self-made man, the liberal environmentalist, the nice guy; Patty, the former basketball star, the repressed stay at home wife; Jessica, the good daughter; Joey, the overindulged brilliant son who at 16 moves out to live with the neighbors (and sleep with their daughter) - once the envied family of the neighborhood, begin to fall apart, Franzen repeatedly shows how personal freedom is not the key to happiness. Questioning our cardinal American value (both in personal life and in the capitalist market), Franzen none-too-subtly declares that freedom can leave us empty while commitment can bring us meaning.

As Patty writes in her third-person "autobiography," "By almost any standard, she led a luxurious life. She had all day every day to figure out some decent and satisfying way to live, and yet all she ever seemed to get for all her choices and all her freedom was more miserable."

Later Walter describes himself as "not being made for a life of freedom and outlaw heroics; of needing a more dully and enduringly discontented situation to struggle against and fashion an existence within." Just a few pages later, he describes his homeless, jobless brother, who lives in a tent at a campground that looks "like an auto junkyard" as a "free man," and it's quite clear to the reader that there is nothing good about his freedom.

Here is absolutely the best critique of the novel that I've read, comparing it to a very similar novel (by a women) that also came out last year. This review convinced me that with my extra reading time this month, I should read The Cookbook Collector by Allegra Goodman. And maybe you should too.

{12 in 12 challenge found here.}

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

cradle

Here is the beautiful cradle Papa made for us, along with a few shots of how the guest room is becoming the nursery/guest room.






The bed and nightstand were Grandma Criss's, and were in my room when I was growing up. That mattress must be 60 years old. The blue down comforter was what I took to college.

I can't wait until Jack finishes his project - something to hang above the bed - so I can show it to you. It's awesome.

Speaking of awesome, we decided to postpone meatless monday to another day this week (when we'll probably just have a simple veggie quiche with crackers). Valentines Day is for carnivores. Jack made osso buco and a light vegetable pasta. For dessert he made carmelized pears over haagen daaz vanilla bean ice cream, with a 70% dark chocolate sauce. Yum.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

visit

Jack's parents came to visit this weekend. They drove 11 hours each way just to spend one full day with us, and to bring us the wooden cradle that Papa handmade for our baby. I'll put a picture of that up after we get a mattress in it. Meanwhile...



Tuesday, February 8, 2011

baby quilts


I finished baby brother's quilt. It's made of new white flannel, and repurposed white corduroy, colored mens' shirts (from the Goodwill), and mens' pants (mostly Jack's). I wasn't super excited about it when I began, but now I totally love it.

It's a little bigger than Rosie's quilt. Neither of them are standard sizes, just sizes that fit my designs.

I really can't believe I have to live with this cumbersome body for two more months before he makes his appearance!

meatless monday: falafel pitas


One of my favorites so far. And chickpeas are an excellent source of iron for this slightly anemic pregnant lady. The falafel was homemade, but all the rest was easy - pitas, hummus, yogurt dressing, and some lettuce and tomato.

jeggings


Playing with friends at the gym on a snow day.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

1 of 12

This year, along with Mom, Jack and I are doing the 12 in 12 challenge: read twelve hefty books in the twelve months of 2011. (John is doing 4 in 4 -- four books of more than a thousand pages in the four seasons of 2011. I don't know if Katie and Elliott, the instigators of last year's 52 in 52, have taken on a book challenge this year, with Desmond and grad school keeping them so busy.)

1 of 12 (Jack) - A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving

1 of 12 (Amy) - Surprised by Hope by N.T. Wright
What a paradigm-shifting book! It moved a little slowly for me in Part I, as Wright sketched today's popular views (in western culture generally as well as within the church) on heaven and the afterlife, and the confusion that accompanies those views. Part III, the practical application of a rethinking of heaven and resurrection, was also a bit slow, but while I was reading Part II, the substantive portion of Wright's argument, I couldn't put it down.

Here's how Wright, in an interview, summarizes it:

"Most Western Christians have grown up with the idea that the name of game is simply to go to heaven when you die. What I routinely say to people is that heaven is important, but it’s not the end of the world.
Wherever we are when we die, the really important thing is where we are after that. There’s a phase two in Christian teachings. Any 1st-Century Christian would have been surprised that you didn’t understand that resurrection isn’t life after death. Resurrection is actually what I’m describing as life after life after death...
After death, people do rest in paradise, if you will. But Phase 2 is really God bringing about new heavens and new earth. It’s right there in the Bible. The payoff in realizing that this is part of the process is that it gives important value to the present space, time and matter in our world. Our faith is all about reaffirming the goodness of God’s Creation. Our faith isn't about fleeing life. God is bringing a new heavens and a new earth.
Let me put this another way. If you say, “This world is not my home. I’m just a-passin’ through,” then what you’re saying is, “What’s the fuss of trying to do anything about this world?” And you’re saying, “There’s no point in trying to make it a better place.” And that’s not what Christianity teaches.
Our faith in resurrection is a reaffirmation of this present world."

This book is definitely worth reading. Practically speaking, it motivated me to build for the kingdom of God, to pray "thy kingdom come on earth," to believe that "in the Lord your labor is not in vain, "(1 Cor 15:58). It also helped me understand the concept of "reward" in resurrection. "It isn't a matter of calculation, of doing a difficult job in order to be paid a wage. It is much more like working at a friendship or a marriage in order to enjoy the other person's company more fully. It is more like practicing golf in order that we can go out on the course and hit the ball in the right direction. It is more like learning German or Greek so that we can read some of the great poets and philosophers who wrote in those languages. The "reward" is organically connected to the activity, not some kind of arbitrary pat on the back, otherwise unrelated to the work that was done."
(If you're interested, here is the Discerning Reader's review of the book.)

postscript: I feel I've been remiss in not also admitting that this month (actually, this week) I have also read the first four books in this cheesy coffehouse mystery series. Here's the first. Go waste some time on them.